Clinton: Caucus States are Undemocratic, Southern States are Too Black, and Red States Don't Matter Anyways.

1. It was a rant - "has found a lot of ways to explain her string of losses"

2. Caucuses favor those who don't work, (watch the exit polls, Hillary leads among those working people - incomes less than 50,000/year but they work and can take the time to vote but not to caucus). This year many did not even require you to be a democrat (sign up at the door) or even be of voting age (if you would be of age in November). There have been a LOT of articles seeded on this issue, starting before the Iowa caucuses (the deal was that for some states it's all they can afford, much cheaper than a primary) Most caucuses are decided by less than 1% of the registered Democrats being a majority in the caucus.

3. The deal with Red states has to do with the Electoral College - you only have so much money, don't waste it on states you won't win.

4. you forgot Florida and Michigan

5. 'Southern states too black' - actually that means (as many as 90% of Black voters) voting for a black candidate because he is black - in 1984 Jesse Jackson won Louisiana, the District of Columbia, South Carolina, Virginia and one of two separate contests in Mississippi. In 1988 he won Alabama, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Puerto Rico and Virginia) and four caucuses (Delaware, Michigan, South Carolina and Vermont). Gee, there wouldn't be any evidence of this would there?

Brandon, you may be a partisan Obama supporter, and it shows, but you need to take a step back and look objectively at what is being said. Opinions held with objective examination are prejudice. Look at who made this rant and what reason they had. Terms like 'sore loser' tell people that you don't have any logic, just a prejudice. That prejudiced opinion may be right and it may be wrong and it may just not be either; but the proof is not in numbers or other prejudiced people agreeing with you but in facts.

Facts are stubborn things.

What I want to see:

what are the results of only those states holding primaries that the democrats need to carry for a chancein the electoral college (blue states) by percentage?

then just the red states results by percentage

then the states that are neither

then the caucus states, separated by red and blue and neither

look at those numbers - then come back to this and report what the numbers say - show some proof, some thought behind it

What I want to see:

what are the results of only those states holding primaries that the democrats need to carry for a chancein the electoral college (blue states) by percentage?

then just the red states results by percentage

then the states that are neither

then the caucus states, separated by red and blue and neither

look at those numbers - then come back to this and report what the numbers say - show some proof, some thought behind it

So you want to make a point but want some one else to do the leg work? Pretty lazy if you ask me.